Should you allow clients into your bug tracking software?

I believe yes, you should. With the proper caveats and training, your client should be able to see what’s going on.

The client has fewer surprises, is in on the problems and #FTW’s. They feel more connected to the product and weirdly will start to feel more “onside”.

Sure it might seem scary at first, but after the initial storming, the process does begin forming!

It’s all about improving process through transparency.

Dropping SASS for LESS

I’ve been asked in interviews, “which one I prefer and why?”, however I’ve never really had a reason for choosing SASS over LESS apart from I found SASS first! They’re both pretty similar and they’re both really useful.

However, now I’m starting to find reasons with the packages I’m using more frequently.

As I’m moving forward with my Laravel work, I’m finding it an annoying process to administer installing RVM (ruby version manager) and then run gem install sass. With LESS, I can install it with npm (Node Package Manager) and boom, I can code on.

Also, it’s what Twitter Bootstrap is built in, so I can use LESS with “less” pain.

So, for simplicity’s sake, I’m moving to LESS, but thank you SASS, it’s been great.

The Tory party is a party for the people (ie. super rich people)

The Tory party is a party of super rich people, which is fine, it’s just important to know. Its leadership is made up of very rich donors from very rich companies and as such, their policies, we need to remember are policies which support those donors. That’s fine. It’s a party made for super rich people.

Are you a super rich “people”, do imagine what they talk about at their banquests are the same as you talk about over dinner?

Nothing about this should surprise anyone by the way, it is a party lead by people who want to protect themselves being super rich.

But, never be mistaken into thinking a Tory party person means YOU when they say, “We’re a party for the people”. Because, they mean for those super rich people who can pay £50,000 to bend the policy makers’ ears.

Do you want to vote for the super rich boys club? Do you think their ideas and values align with yours?

Professional alternatives to Facebook groups or Moodle Forums

You will find many different tools used for business collaboration, and new ones pop up every year.

Here are some we know of that you could use to replace your Moodle Forums and Facebook problem and be more on the “pulse”.

Google Drive

Share Documents, Spreadsheets with version control. Also a tool to have hangouts (video conference) and have group text chats. Free service.

  • Documents
  • Spreadsheets
  • Group text chat
  • Hangouts (Vid. Conference)
  • File Sharing


A repository for files, it will automatically push any saved files to all the other members with the shared DropBox. Good for saving large files and sharing with each other, less useful for versioning without an account. Free service.

  • Shared folder (you still need Office apps)


Microsoft’s offering, share documents and more. Takes setting up and costs, however it’s an industry standard.

  • Documents
  • Spreadsheets
  • Group chat
  • File Sharing
  • Versioning


You can setup a group and hold a chat on the network you’re always on. But, we doubt an organisation would handle all their business discussion here. Also, would you want to mix work and online socialising? Free service.

  • Group chat
  • File emailing (No versioning)


The technology that runs Wikipedia, gives the ability to create shared pages and thoughts and revisions. You can share, collaborate, update and see revisions. Free services available.

  • File sharing
  • Text versioning


Some services come with versioning on documents, which means you can see the updates and text changes on files. This allows users to work collaboratively and see what changes the group have made, and discuss them. Also, it stops the need to keep naming files like, “copy 1″, “copy 2″, “Final Version”, “final version 2.3″ as it’s just one continues file.


Lots of companies advertise their products as “Free”, however that comes at a cost not associated with money. They effectively own your data, and probably have free reign to sell it on, use it to advertise with or if they shut down, your data goes to the highest bidder.

Other services may offer you a limited time access or file number limit before you need to pay.

Moodle Forums, are they any good or do your students prefer Facebook?

Are your students favouring Facebook groups for course discussion over using Moodle forums?

You wouldn’t be the only University with that problem. Naturally water follows the easiest path, and presently for having online discussions it’s simpler to jump on Facebook for a casual chat. It totally beats some clunky Forum software.

But, is that even a problem? Is this practice just replacing them chatting about their project down the SU over a pint?

To be honest, in a lot of the cases there’s no problem for a casual chat. But as there’s pressure to prepare students to be more work ready, I can’t think of a workplace I’ve been in where sitting on Facebook to work would be thought a good idea. Also, by the staff being removed from the equation we’re missing the chance to pick up on problems.

So in a future blog post, I’m going to list some alternative “professional” software which your University could recommend to them.

Present development work without a live server

So on the Agile Development project I’m running we don’t have a feature to sort out a live or testing server yet. In fact that might still be a couple of weeks off.

So how do you show your work off earlier for quality assurance before you have a server?

We’ve found at the University of Warwick you can present your work with quick screencasts, something offered by Quickcast (


Quickcast video

Then link it up in the Trello ticket and get the client to QA based on what they see. That means we can delay the need for a server feature until we really really have to.

Also, a video means with a remote client they get to see your face on occasion!